Breaking barriers in the career development of women in academic psychiatry
Author Information
Author(s): Mariana Pinto da Costa, Silvana Galderisi, Helen Herrman, Anita Riecher-Rössler, Danuta Wasserman
Primary Institution: Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
Hypothesis
Women encounter more obstacles hindering their progress in academia than men.
Conclusion
Creating a supportive environment and addressing gender-related barriers is essential for the career development of women in academic psychiatry.
Supporting Evidence
- Women face slower promotion rates and inconsistent paid family leave policies.
- Women are less likely to receive independent funding or publish in high-impact journals.
- Women academic psychiatrists may face unfair treatment in their career progression.
- Women are underrepresented as first and last authors in high-impact journals.
Takeaway
Women in academic psychiatry face more challenges than men, and we need to help them succeed by making things fairer and more supportive.
Potential Biases
The article may reflect biases in the representation of women's experiences in academia.
Limitations
The article does not provide new data or specific quantitative analysis.
Participant Demographics
The article discusses women in academic psychiatry but does not provide specific demographic data.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website