Fluoroscopic Placement of Double-Pigtail Ureteral Stents
2001

Fluoroscopic Placement of Double-Pigtail Ureteral Stents

Sample size: 121 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): GREGORY L. CHEN, DEMETRIUS H. BAGLEY

Primary Institution: Kaiser Permanente Medical Center; Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University

Hypothesis

The study aims to compare the effectiveness of fluoroscopic versus cystoscopic placement of ureteral stents.

Conclusion

Fluoroscopic placement of ureteral stents is a safe and effective technique with a 100% success rate.

Supporting Evidence

  • All 89 attempts at placing stents fluoroscopically were successful.
  • No stents migrated or required replacement.
  • Stents were placed after ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and tumor treatment.

Takeaway

Doctors can use a special X-ray technique to place tubes in the kidneys without needing to look inside with a camera, and it works really well.

Methodology

A non-randomized prospective study comparing fluoroscopic and cystoscopic placement of ureteral stents in 121 patients.

Limitations

The study is non-randomized and may not account for all variables affecting stent placement success.

Participant Demographics

Ages ranged from 3 to 89 years, with 56 females and 65 males.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication