Enhancing early detection of cognitive decline in the elderly: a comparative study utilizing large language models in clinical notes
2024

Using AI to Detect Cognitive Decline in Older Adults

Sample size: 2166 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Du Xinsong, Novoa-Laurentiev John, Plasek Joseph M., Chuang Ya-Wen, Wang Liqin, Marshall Gad A., Mueller Stephanie K., Chang Frank, Datta Surabhi, Paek Hunki, Lin Bin, Wei Qiang, Wang Xiaoyan, Wang Jingqi, Ding Hao, Manion Frank J., Du Jingcheng, Bates David W., Zhou Li

Primary Institution: Brigham and Women's Hospital

Hypothesis

Can large language models effectively identify signs of cognitive decline in electronic health records?

Conclusion

The study found that an ensemble model combining large language models and traditional machine learning methods significantly improved the detection of cognitive decline in clinical notes.

Supporting Evidence

  • The ensemble model outperformed individual models in all evaluation metrics.
  • GPT-4 showed superior accuracy compared to Llama 2 but did not surpass traditional models.
  • Error analysis revealed diverse error profiles among the models.

Takeaway

Researchers used AI to look for signs of memory problems in doctors' notes about older patients, and found that combining different types of AI made it better at spotting these issues.

Methodology

The study analyzed clinical notes from patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment, using large language models and traditional machine learning models to compare their performance.

Potential Biases

The study's reliance on electronic health records may introduce biases related to data quality and completeness.

Limitations

The models may not represent the latest advancements in AI, and the data used were not patient-based, which could affect the accuracy of distinguishing between reversible and progressive cognitive decline.

Participant Demographics

Patients aged 50 and older, with a mean age of 76 years; 53.1% were women.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.01

Confidence Interval

[95% CI: 81.9%–96.8%]

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105401

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication