Is It Just About Scrolling? The Correlation of Passive Social Media Use with College Students’ Subjective Well-Being Based on Social Comparison Experiences and Orientation Assessed Using a Two-Stage Hybrid Structural Equation Modeling–Artificial Neural Network Method
2024

The Impact of Passive Social Media Use on College Students' Well-Being

Sample size: 352 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Liu Ziyu, Xiao Liyao, Bond Bradley J.

Primary Institution: Department of Media Content, Cheongju University, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea

Hypothesis

How does passive social media use affect college students' subjective well-being through social comparison experiences?

Conclusion

Passive social media use is linked to lower subjective well-being, particularly through upward contrast and downward identification.

Supporting Evidence

  • Passive social media use is positively correlated with upward contrast and downward identification.
  • Upward contrast and downward identification negatively affect subjective well-being.
  • High social comparison orientation strengthens the negative impact of upward contrast on well-being.
  • Downward identification significantly mediates the relationship between passive social media use and subjective well-being.

Takeaway

Using social media without interacting can make you feel worse about yourself, especially when you compare yourself to others who seem better off.

Methodology

The study used a two-stage hybrid SEM-ANN method to analyze survey data from college students using the RED platform.

Potential Biases

Self-reported data may not accurately reflect actual social media usage and its effects.

Limitations

The study relies on self-reported data, which may introduce bias, and it does not account for various demographic factors that could influence results.

Participant Demographics

Participants included 157 males (44.6%) and 195 females (55.4%), primarily undergraduate students (90.63%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/bs14121162

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication