Prevalence and associations of anisometropia with spherical ametropia, cylindrical power, age, and sex, based on 134,603 refractive surgery candidates
2025

Anisometropia and Its Associations in Refractive Surgery Candidates

Sample size: 134603 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Deuchert Mona, Frings Andreas, Druchkiv Vasyl, Schweighofer Jakob, Muhammad Sajjad, Linke Stephan, Katz Toam

Primary Institution: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany

Hypothesis

To examine the prevalence and associations of anisometropia with spherical ametropia, cylindrical power, age, and sex.

Conclusion

The study found independent associations between anisometropia and spherical power, cylindrical power, age, and sex in myopic and hyperopic individuals.

Supporting Evidence

  • The median level of anisometropia was 0.38 D.
  • The prevalence of anisometropia was found to be 17.9%.
  • An increase in cylindrical power by 7.8 D reduced the chance of observing anisometropia by half.
  • Age was positively associated with anisometropia in myopes but negatively in hyperopes.
  • Female sex was positively related to anisometropia in myopes, while male sex was positively related in hyperopes.

Takeaway

This study looked at a lot of people who needed eye surgery and found that differences in how well each eye sees can be linked to age, gender, and how far-sighted or near-sighted someone is.

Methodology

The study analyzed data from 134,603 refractive surgery candidates from 2010 to 2020, using chi-squared tests, nonparametric tests, and logistic regression to assess associations.

Potential Biases

Selection bias may affect the generalizability of the findings due to the specific population studied.

Limitations

The study population is not representative of the general population, as it only includes refractive surgery candidates.

Participant Demographics

The average age of participants was 38 years, with approximately 81% being myopic and 19% hyperopic.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.12–0.75 D

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0315080

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication