Myths and Misconceptions of Intimate Partner Violence Among Sexual and Gender Minorities
Author Information
Author(s): Kurbatfinski Stefan, Letourneau Nicole, Marshall Susanne, McBride Dawn, Novick Jason, Griggs Keira, Perrotta Arielle, Daye Morgan, McManus Carrie, Nixon Kendra
Primary Institution: University of Calgary
Hypothesis
What myths and misconceptions do SGM individuals experiencing IPV and relevant service providers encounter regarding SGM IPV?
Conclusion
The study identifies and discusses various myths and misconceptions about intimate partner violence among sexual and gender minorities, highlighting their impacts and providing recommendations for better support.
Supporting Evidence
- Participants reported feeling reluctant to seek help due to invalidating responses from support systems.
- Many myths about IPV in SGM relationships lead to underreporting and misunderstanding of their experiences.
- Service providers noted that misconceptions about SGM IPV often result in inadequate support and care.
Takeaway
This study talks about the wrong ideas people have about violence in relationships for LGBTQ+ folks and how these ideas can make it harder for them to get help.
Methodology
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 18 SGM individuals who experienced IPV and 8 service providers.
Potential Biases
Potential biases from researchers and societal misconceptions about SGM IPV may have influenced findings.
Limitations
Some gender and sexual orientations were not adequately represented, limiting findings for those specific identity groups.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 18 SGM individuals (mean age 28.94 years) and 8 service providers, with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website