Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health Care in Zimbabwe
Author Information
Author(s): Hansen Kristian Schultz, Chapman Glyn
Primary Institution: University of Aarhus, Denmark
Hypothesis
Can cost-effectiveness analysis help prioritize health interventions in Zimbabwe?
Conclusion
The study demonstrated that cost-effectiveness analyses can identify feasible health interventions to improve public health in Zimbabwe.
Supporting Evidence
- Cost-effectiveness analysis can help prioritize health interventions.
- Very cost-effective interventions were identified for major health problems.
- Packages of health interventions could avert a significant burden of disease.
Takeaway
This study looked at how to spend health care money wisely in Zimbabwe, showing that some treatments can save a lot of lives without costing too much.
Methodology
Cost per DALY for 65 health interventions was estimated using data from health centers and hospitals, applying step-down and micro-costing methods.
Potential Biases
Potential biases due to reliance on expert estimates for effectiveness rather than actual data.
Limitations
The study faced limitations due to a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of many health interventions and the need for extensive data collection.
Participant Demographics
The study focused on the Zimbabwean population, particularly in the context of health care access and disease burden.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website