Comparing Pulse Oximeters for Newborn Resuscitation
Author Information
Author(s): Hernando Baquero, Alviz Ramiro, Armando Castillo, Fredy Neira, Augusto Sola
Primary Institution: Universidad del Norte
Hypothesis
The time to obtain a reliable oxygen saturation reading differs by the type of pulse oximeter used during neonatal resuscitation.
Conclusion
The Masimo Radical-7 pulse oximeter provides significantly faster reliable readings compared to other monitors during neonatal resuscitation.
Supporting Evidence
- The Radical-7 achieved stable readings in about 20 seconds, while the Biox 3700 took about 74 seconds.
- The N-395 monitor took about 67 seconds to achieve stable readings.
- Statistical analysis showed significant differences in response times between the monitors.
Takeaway
Some pulse oximeters can tell doctors how much oxygen a baby needs faster than others, which helps keep babies safe during emergencies.
Methodology
A prospective observational study comparing three pulse oximeters in newborns requiring resuscitation.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the non-blinded design and the involvement of the research team in sensor placement.
Limitations
The study was not blinded and had a small sample size for some comparisons.
Participant Demographics
Infants with a median gestational age of 32 weeks, with 68% delivered by cesarean section.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.02 and 0.03
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website