Effects of high volume saline enemas vs no enema during labour – The N-Ma Randomised Controlled Trial
2006

Effects of High Volume Saline Enemas During Labour

Sample size: 443 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Luis Gabriel Cuervo, María del Pilar Bernal, Natalia Mendoza

Primary Institution: Universidad Javeriana

Hypothesis

The use of high volume enemas during the first stage of labour does not modify neonatal and puerperal infectious rates.

Conclusion

This study found no evidence to support the routine use of enemas during labour.

Supporting Evidence

  • Enemas did not significantly change infection rates in mothers or newborns.
  • Median labour time was similar between groups.
  • Overall infection rate for newborns was 21%, and for women was 18%.
  • Follow-up was completed by 87% of women and 86% of newborns.

Takeaway

The study looked at whether giving women enemas during labor helps prevent infections. It found that enemas don't really help and might not be worth the trouble.

Methodology

Randomised controlled trial comparing 1 litre saline enema versus no enema during the first stage of labour.

Potential Biases

Recruitment rates varied among different interns and residents, which could introduce bias.

Limitations

The study may have been underpowered to detect differences for individual outcomes.

Participant Demographics

443 women with low-risk pregnancies, gestational age ≥ 36 weeks, and no pelvic or systemic bacterial infections.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P = 0.24

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.43 to 1.03

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2393-6-8

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication