Efficacy and Safety of Artemether in the Treatment of Chronic Fascioliasis in Egypt: Exploratory Phase-2 Trials
2011

Efficacy and Safety of Artemether in Treating Chronic Fascioliasis in Egypt

Sample size: 36 publication 10 minutes Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Jennifer Keiser, Hanan Sayed, Maged El-Ghanam, Hoda Sabry, Saad Anani, Aly El-Wakeel, Christoph Hatz, Jürg Utzinger, Sayed Seif el-Din, Walaa El-Maadawy, Sanaa Botros

Primary Institution: Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland

Hypothesis

Can artemether be an effective treatment for chronic fascioliasis?

Conclusion

Artemether shows little to no effect against fascioliasis and is not a substitute for triclabendazole.

Supporting Evidence

  • Artemether was administered in two different regimens: 6×80 mg over 3 days and 3×200 mg within 24 hours.
  • Cure rates for artemether were 35% for the 6×80 mg regimen and only 6% for the 3×200 mg regimen.
  • Triclabendazole showed higher efficacy with cure rates of 69% and 75% for 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg doses, respectively.
  • Adverse events were mild and included abdominal pain, fatigue, and headache.

Takeaway

This study tested a medicine called artemether to see if it could help people with a liver infection caused by a parasite. It didn't work well, so another medicine is still needed.

Methodology

Two exploratory phase-2 trials were conducted with 36 Fasciola-infected individuals in Egypt, assessing the efficacy and safety of two artemether regimens.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to non-randomized design and lack of control group.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and was not randomized.

Participant Demographics

Participants included 20 individuals in the first study (10 males, 10 females, aged 5-70 years) and 17 in the second study (10 females, 7 males, aged 5-26 years).

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.048

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 0.002–1.15

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pntd.0001285

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication