The impact of generic-only drug benefits on patients' use of inhaled corticosteroids in a Medicare population with asthma
2008

Impact of Generic-Only Drug Benefits on Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Medicare Patients with Asthma

Sample size: 1802 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Vicki Fung, Ira B. Tager, Richard Brand, Joseph P. Newhouse, John Hsu

Primary Institution: Kaiser Permanente Division of Research

Hypothesis

How does the introduction of generic-only drug coverage affect the use of inhaled corticosteroids among Medicare patients with asthma?

Conclusion

Patients reduced their inhaled corticosteroid use in response to losing drug coverage, but switching to lower-cost options helped mitigate this reduction.

Supporting Evidence

  • 74% of patients switched to generic-only coverage, leading to reduced inhaled corticosteroid use.
  • Patients using higher-cost inhaled corticosteroids were more likely to switch to lower-cost options under restricted coverage.
  • Restricted coverage was associated with a decrease in inhaled corticosteroid use among patients who did not switch.

Takeaway

When patients had to pay more for their asthma medicine because of insurance changes, they used it less. But if they switched to a cheaper version, they didn't stop using it as much.

Methodology

The study used linear difference-in-difference models to analyze changes in inhaled corticosteroid use before and after the introduction of generic-only coverage.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to unmeasured confounding factors despite adjustments for many socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.

Limitations

The study was non-randomized, which may introduce unmeasured differences between groups.

Participant Demographics

Participants were Medicare Advantage beneficiaries aged 65 and older with asthma, with a mix of gender and race/ethnicity.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI: -25.0 to -6.0

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-8-151

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication