Evaluating a Medical Programme as a Complex System
Author Information
Author(s): Prozesky Detlef R., Kebaetse Masego B., Mogodi Mpho S., Molwantwa Mmoloki C.
Primary Institution: University of Botswana
Hypothesis
How can a comprehensive evaluation process be developed to understand an undergraduate medical programme as a complex system?
Conclusion
The 'six-step process' is a valid and useful approach for evaluating complex educational programmes.
Supporting Evidence
- The evaluation process was validated against Cilliers’s ten features of a complex system.
- Data triangulation was prominently featured in the study.
- The review included 90 evaluation questions derived from various standards.
- Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from multiple sources.
- The study involved a comprehensive review of a medical programme established in 2009.
Takeaway
This study created a six-step method to review a medical school program, helping to understand how all its parts work together.
Methodology
A mixed methods design was used, collecting both quantitative and qualitative data through 96 different instruments over 12 months.
Potential Biases
Insider bias may have influenced the evaluation process.
Limitations
Data sharing is restricted due to participant consent agreements.
Participant Demographics
Participants included faculty, staff, and students from the University of Botswana.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website