Correlated effects of selection for immunity in White Leghorn chicken lines on natural antibodies and specific antibody responses to KLH and M. butyricum
2008

Effects of Immune Selection in Chickens

Sample size: 400 publication 15 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Giulietta Minozzi, Henk K. Parmentier, Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau, Mike Nieuwland, Bertrand Bed'hom, David Gourichon, Francis Minvielle, Marie-Helen Pinard-van der Laan

Primary Institution: INRA/AgroParisTech, UMR1236 Génétique et Diversité Animales, France

Hypothesis

Does selection for specific immune traits in chickens affect their overall immune response to different antigens?

Conclusion

The study found that immune responses to KLH and M. butyricum varied among chicken lines selected for different immune traits, indicating that selection can enhance responses specific to the selected trait.

Supporting Evidence

  • Chickens selected for high antibody response showed different immune responses to KLH and M. butyricum.
  • Natural antibodies binding to KLH and LPS did not differ significantly between lines.
  • Significant line effects were observed for immune measures after immunization.

Takeaway

Scientists studied chickens to see how breeding for certain immune traits affects their ability to fight off different germs. They found that chickens bred for one type of immunity did better against certain germs.

Methodology

The study involved 12 generations of selection for three immune traits in White Leghorn chickens, with immune responses measured before and after immunization with KLH and M. butyricum.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in selection methods and environmental factors affecting immune responses.

Limitations

The study was limited to specific chicken lines and may not generalize to all poultry breeds.

Participant Demographics

White Leghorn chickens, with 200 chicks per line, totaling 800 chicks.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2156-9-5

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication