Gastrazole (JB95008), a novel CCK2/gastrin receptor antagonist, in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: results from two randomised controlled trials
2006

Gastrazole for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Sample size: 116 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Chau I, Cunningham D, Russell C, Norman A R, Kurzawinski T, Harper P, Harrison P, Middleton G, Daniels F, Hickish T, Prendeville J, Ross P J, Theis B, Hull R, Walker M, Shankley N, Kalindjian B, Murray G, Gillbanks A, Black J

Primary Institution: Royal Marsden Hospital

Hypothesis

Does gastrazole improve survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer compared to placebo and fluorouracil?

Conclusion

Gastrazole appeared to improve survival compared to placebo but did not show a survival advantage over fluorouracil.

Supporting Evidence

  • Gastrazole produced significantly better survival compared to placebo (median 7.9 months vs 4.5 months).
  • No significant survival difference was detected between gastrazole and 5-FU (median: 3.6 vs 4.2 months).
  • Toxicity of gastrazole was mild with significantly less diarrhoea, stomatitis, and hand-foot syndrome compared to 5-FU.

Takeaway

Gastrazole might help people with advanced pancreatic cancer live longer than those who get a placebo, but it doesn't work better than a common chemotherapy drug called fluorouracil.

Methodology

Two randomized controlled trials were conducted comparing gastrazole with placebo and fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the small sample size and the nature of the trials.

Limitations

The sample size was small, and the trials were underpowered to detect significant differences in survival between gastrazole and fluorouracil.

Participant Demographics

Patients with biopsy-proven, inoperable pancreatic carcinoma, aged 18 or older.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.02

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 7.8–62.3%

Statistical Significance

p=0.02

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6603058

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication