A Practical Approach to the Diagnosis of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Author Information
Author(s): Jaiyeoba Oluwatosin, Soper David E.
Primary Institution: Medical University of South Carolina
Hypothesis
How can clinicians effectively diagnose pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) given the challenges and limitations of current diagnostic methods?
Conclusion
A clinical approach based on symptoms and signs of inflammation is the most practical and cost-effective way to diagnose PID.
Supporting Evidence
- The clinical diagnosis of PID has a positive predictive value of 65% when confirmed by laparoscopy.
- Empiric antibiotic treatment is recommended for sexually active young women with pelvic pain and risk factors for STIs.
- Ultrasonography is the preferred imaging method for diagnosing PID.
Takeaway
Doctors need to look for signs of infection in women with pelvic pain to decide if they should give antibiotics for pelvic inflammatory disease.
Methodology
The article reviews clinical criteria, diagnostic tests, and imaging studies for diagnosing PID.
Limitations
The clinical diagnosis of PID is imprecise, and no single test reliably predicts PID.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website