Tetraploid and hexaploid wheat varieties reveal large differences in expression of alpha-gliadins from homoeologous Gli-2 loci
2009

Differences in α-gliadin Expression in Wheat Varieties

Sample size: 16 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Salentijn Elma MJ, Goryunova Svetlana V, Bas Noor, van der Meer Ingrid M, van den Broeck Hetty C, Bastien Thomas, Gilissen Luud JWJ, Smulders Marinus JM

Primary Institution: Plant Research International, Wageningen UR

Hypothesis

How do expression levels of α-gliadins from different Gli-2 loci vary among tetraploid and hexaploid wheat genotypes?

Conclusion

The study found significant differences in α-gliadin expression levels among various wheat genotypes, which can help in selecting varieties with lower celiac disease immunogenic potential.

Supporting Evidence

  • The relative Gli-A2 expression level in a tetraploid durum wheat cultivar was 41%.
  • In hexaploid bread wheat cultivars, the Gli-A2 frequency varied between 12% and 58%.
  • Some advanced hexaploid cultivars showed less than 5% expression from the Gli-B2 locus.
  • Pyrosequencing can be used for gene family-specific quantitative transcriptome profiling.
  • Landraces showed a higher variation in α-gliadin expression compared to advanced cultivars.

Takeaway

Different types of wheat have different amounts of a protein that can make some people sick, and this study helps find the ones that are safer to eat.

Methodology

The study used quantitative pyrosequencing to analyze the expression levels of α-gliadin genes from different Gli-2 loci in various wheat genotypes.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in selection of wheat varieties analyzed may affect generalizability.

Limitations

The study was limited to a few wheat accessions and may not represent all genetic diversity in wheat.

Participant Demographics

Wheat varieties included advanced cultivars and landraces from various geographical origins.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2164-10-48

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication