Safety-netting advice documentation in out-of-hours primary care: a retrospective cohort from 2013 to 2020
2025

Safety-netting Advice in Out-of-Hours Primary Care

Sample size: 1886 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Peter J Edwards, Samuel Finnikin, Fay Wilson, Ian Bennett-Britton, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Rebecca K Barnes, Rupert A Payne

Primary Institution: University of Bristol

Hypothesis

How frequently is safety-netting advice documented in out-of-hours primary care?

Conclusion

The frequency of safety-netting advice documented in out-of-hours primary care was higher than previously reported during in-hours care.

Supporting Evidence

  • The overall frequency of safety-netting advice was 78.0% per consultation.
  • SNA was more frequently documented in face-to-face encounters compared to telephone consultations.
  • Consultations for possible infections had a higher frequency of documented SNA.
  • Only one in five consultations included a timeframe for reconsulting for persistent symptoms.
  • Documentation of SNA increased from 75.7% in 2014 to 81.5% in 2019.

Takeaway

Doctors are telling patients more often what to watch for when they are sick, especially in face-to-face visits, but they still need to improve on giving specific advice for mental health issues.

Methodology

A retrospective cohort study using a stratified sample of 30 adult consultation records per month from July 2013 to February 2020, assessed with a safety-netting coding tool.

Potential Biases

All clinicians were from the same out-of-hours organization, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Limitations

The study only evaluated documented safety-netting advice, which may not fully represent verbalized advice given during consultations.

Participant Demographics

62.9% female, mean age 57.8 years, 37.3% from very deprived backgrounds.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.02

Confidence Interval

1.09 to 2.85

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3399/BJGP.2024.0057

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication