Ethics and Legal Aspects of 'Not for Resuscitation'
Author Information
Author(s): Naveen Sulakshan Salins, Sachin Gopalakrishna, Vidyasagar MS, Sobhana Manikkath
Primary Institution: Shiridi SaiBaba Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, KMC Manipal, Manipal University
Conclusion
The article discusses the ethical and legal challenges surrounding 'not for resuscitation' orders in India, emphasizing the need for clearer guidelines and patient autonomy.
Supporting Evidence
- Patient autonomy is often overlooked in resuscitation decisions.
- Many patients and families lack adequate information about CPR outcomes.
- Informal practices in issuing 'not for resuscitation' orders can lead to ethical dilemmas.
Takeaway
This study talks about how doctors and families make tough decisions about resuscitation when someone is very sick, and it shows that patients should have a say in what happens to them.
Potential Biases
Paternalistic practices may lead to decisions being made without adequate patient or family input.
Limitations
The lack of formal processes and guidelines for 'not for resuscitation' in India complicates decision-making.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website