Normative Data for Posturography: A Systematic Review
Author Information
Author(s): Julienne Angela, Verbecque Evi, Besnard Stéphane
Primary Institution: University of Caen Normandy
Hypothesis
What are the normative data for computerized posturography in healthy populations?
Conclusion
The study found significant differences in postural sway based on age and sex, with females generally showing more stability than males.
Supporting Evidence
- Females outperformed males in eyes closed conditions significantly.
- Younger children swayed more than those aged between 8 and 14 years.
- Older participants showed more instability than younger individuals.
- Normative data are essential for interpreting posturography results in clinical settings.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well people can balance and found that girls are usually better at it than boys, especially when their eyes are closed. Younger kids and older adults also have more trouble balancing.
Methodology
The study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed existing literature on normative data for computerized posturography, including a comprehensive search of databases and screening of articles.
Potential Biases
High risk of bias due to variability in study methodologies and lack of reporting.
Limitations
The study noted extensive heterogeneity in methodological characteristics and insufficient risk of bias mitigation.
Participant Demographics
The sample included 42,408 participants, with 12,043 females and 13,761 males, primarily regular individuals, children, and young adults.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p=0.01
Confidence Interval
95% CI: −0.34, −0.10
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website