Circumcision
2010

Circumcision: A Review of Controversies and Health Implications

publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Poonam Puri, Joginder Kumar, Ramesh V.

Primary Institution: Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Hypothesis

Is routine circumcision necessary for health benefits in males?

Conclusion

Circumcision should only be performed for established medical reasons and not routinely recommended.

Supporting Evidence

  • 30% of males worldwide are circumcised, with a higher prevalence among Muslims.
  • Circumcision can reduce the risk of urinary tract infections in infants.
  • Circumcised men have a lower risk of acquiring HIV.
  • Female genital mutilation (FGM) has no health benefits and poses significant risks.

Takeaway

Circumcision is when part of the penis is removed, and while some people think it helps with health, it should only be done if there's a good reason.

Methodology

Review of existing literature and practices regarding circumcision and its implications.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in reporting due to cultural and religious beliefs surrounding circumcision.

Limitations

The review may not cover all cultural perspectives and practices related to circumcision.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.4103/2589-0557.74967

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication