Coreceptor and Cytokine Concentrations May Not Explain Differences in Disease Progression Observed in HIV-1 Clade A and D Infected Ugandans
2011

HIV Coreceptor and Cytokine Levels in Ugandans with Different HIV Clades

Sample size: 50 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Wright Edward, Mugaba Susan, Grant Paul, Parkes-Ratanshi Rosalind, Van der Paal Lieve, Grosskurth Heiner, Kaleebu Pontiano

Primary Institution: MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Uganda Virus Research Institute

Hypothesis

Do coreceptor and cytokine concentrations differ between HIV-1 clade A and D infected individuals?

Conclusion

The study found that changes in coreceptor and cytokine levels do not explain the differences in disease progression between HIV-1 clade A and D infections.

Supporting Evidence

  • Late stage participants had significantly fewer CD4+/CCR5+ T-cells compared to early stage participants.
  • There was a significant difference in CXCR4 density between clade A and D infected early stage participants.
  • Th1 cytokine concentrations were significantly higher than Th2 cytokines across all participants.

Takeaway

Researchers looked at blood samples from people with HIV to see if certain proteins affected how fast the disease got worse. They found that these proteins didn't really explain the differences in how quickly people got sick.

Methodology

The study analyzed blood samples from 50 HIV-1 infected individuals, measuring CD4+ T-cells expressing CCR5 or CXCR4 and cytokine concentrations.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the sampling strategy, which may have skewed gender representation.

Limitations

The study was limited to two HIV clades and may not be generalizable to other populations or clades.

Participant Demographics

Participants were HIV-1 infected individuals from rural Uganda, with a mix of early and late disease stages.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.0113

Confidence Interval

95% C.I. [663–808] for early stage CD4+ count

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0019902

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication