Chlamydia and Gonorrhoea in Pregnant Women in Botswana
Author Information
Author(s): Romoren Maria, Sundby Johanne, Velauthapillai Manonmany, Rahman Mafizur, Klouman Elise, Hjortdahl Per
Primary Institution: Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo
Hypothesis
Can risk scores improve the diagnostic accuracy of cervical infections in pregnant women using the syndromic approach?
Conclusion
The syndromic approach is unsuitable for diagnosing cervical infections in antenatal care attendees in Botswana, and none of the evaluated risk scores can replace this management.
Supporting Evidence
- The prevalence of chlamydia was 8%, and gonorrhoea was found in 3% of the attendees.
- Symptoms and signs of vaginal discharge did not predict cervical infection.
- A risk score based on sociodemographic factors had similar likelihood ratios to those incorporating clinical signs.
- All evaluated risk scores were of limited value in diagnosing chlamydia and gonorrhoea.
Takeaway
This study looked at pregnant women in Botswana and found that the usual way of diagnosing infections isn't working well, so we need better tests.
Methodology
A cross-sectional study where 703 antenatal care attendees were interviewed and examined for cervical infections.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to reliance on self-reported symptoms and the syndromic approach.
Limitations
The study relied on a syndromic approach which is known to be inadequate for accurate diagnosis.
Participant Demographics
Pregnant women attending antenatal care in Gaborone, Botswana.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.000
Confidence Interval
95% CI: 13 to 32
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website