Carpal tunnel syndrome and the 'double crush' hypothesis: a review and implications for chiropractic
2008

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and the Double Crush Hypothesis

Sample size: 125 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Russell Brent S

Primary Institution: Life University

Hypothesis

Does the double crush hypothesis explain the relationship between cervical spine dysfunction and carpal tunnel syndrome?

Conclusion

The original double crush hypothesis is likely flawed, but exploring multiple sites of nerve compression may still be valuable.

Supporting Evidence

  • Many chiropractors believe that neck problems contribute to carpal tunnel syndrome.
  • Some studies suggest that patients with carpal tunnel syndrome often have neck pain.
  • Research has not definitively proven the double crush hypothesis.

Takeaway

Some people think that problems in the neck can make carpal tunnel syndrome worse, but the idea isn't fully proven.

Methodology

The author reviewed literature and conducted a search for chiropractic practices discussing the double crush syndrome.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in interpreting the relationship between cervical spine issues and carpal tunnel syndrome due to the author's perspective.

Limitations

The review is based on existing literature, which may not definitively establish the relationship between cervical issues and carpal tunnel syndrome.

Participant Demographics

The study primarily discusses chiropractic practices and literature, with a focus on patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1746-1340-16-2

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication