Decision criteria for the selection of analytical instruments used in clinical chemistry
1980

Decision Criteria for Selecting Analytical Instruments in Clinical Chemistry

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Thomas M. Craig

Primary Institution: E1 du Pont de Nemours & Co, Wilmington, Delaware

Hypothesis

Can emergency tests be effectively included in proposed laboratory structures?

Conclusion

Different analyzers have varying capabilities, and some structures may require additional equipment, which could be costly.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study highlights the importance of evaluating both direct and indirect costs in laboratory automation.
  • Batch size significantly affects the cost per test, impacting the overall cost-effectiveness of analyzers.
  • The Du Pont Value-In-Use Analysis has been applied in various clinical laboratories to assess automation costs.

Takeaway

This study looks at how to choose the best machines for testing in hospitals, making sure they work well and don't cost too much.

Methodology

Simulation experiments were conducted to evaluate laboratory systems and their performance under different conditions.

Potential Biases

Results may vary significantly based on the specific laboratory system and request profiles.

Limitations

The study did not consider financial aspects, reliability, and external effectiveness of laboratory reports.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication