Agreement between pedometer and accelerometer in measuring physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women
2011

Comparing Pedometer and Accelerometer for Measuring Physical Activity in Pregnant Women

Sample size: 58 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Tarja I Kinnunen, Peter W G Tennant, Catherine McParlin, Lucilla Poston, Stephen C Robson, Ruth Bell

Primary Institution: Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University

Hypothesis

Are pedometers and accelerometers comparable in measuring physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women?

Conclusion

The overall agreement between pedometer and accelerometer step counts was poor, indicating they cannot be used interchangeably in overweight and obese pregnant women.

Supporting Evidence

  • Pedometer step counts correlated moderately with most accelerometer measures of physical activity.
  • The median step counts recorded by the pedometer and accelerometer were not significantly different.
  • Agreement in categorizing participants as active or inactive varied from moderate to good.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well two devices, a pedometer and an accelerometer, measure steps in pregnant women. They found that while both devices can show similar step counts, they don't always agree on how active someone is.

Methodology

Pregnant women wore both a pedometer and an accelerometer for four days to compare step counts and physical activity levels.

Potential Biases

Potential differences in wearing time for the monitors could affect the results.

Limitations

The study's sample was limited to women in early pregnancy, and the participation rate was low.

Participant Demographics

Participants were overweight and obese pregnant women with a median age of 32 years and median BMI of 29.3 kg/m2.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.37

Confidence Interval

95% limits of agreement ranged from -2690 to 2656 steps/day.

Statistical Significance

p=0.37

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-11-501

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication