Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI
Author Information
Author(s): Giuseppe Banff, Marina Pontillo, Paola Notti, Pierangelo Bonini
Primary Institution: Istituto Scientifico S. Raffaele
Hypothesis
The Coulter Counter S-Plus VI automatic analyser for haematology will show improved performance compared to the S-Plus IV/D model.
Conclusion
The Coulter S-Plus VI demonstrates good agreement with manual counting and offers advantages such as reduced running costs and improved operator safety.
Supporting Evidence
- The Coulter S-Plus VI showed only 2.5% discrepancies compared to manual counting in 2271 samples.
- The instrument demonstrated excellent linearity and precision across various parameters.
- Stability tests indicated good performance up to 8 hours after blood drawing.
- Carry-over was negligible even in extreme conditions.
- Automation reduced manual work and potential errors in sample handling.
Takeaway
The new blood testing machine works well and is safer for people because it doesn't require touching blood.
Methodology
The study involved comparing the performance of the Coulter S-Plus VI with the S-Plus IV/D using routine samples and various tests for linearity, precision, accuracy, and stability.
Potential Biases
Potential bias from operators being unaware of the results from the Coulter S-Plus VI during comparisons.
Limitations
The study may not fully represent all patient populations due to the specific sample demographics used.
Participant Demographics
Routine samples from inpatients and outpatients were used.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website