Automated Methods for Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections
Author Information
Author(s): Richard Platt, Deborah S. Yokoe, Kenneth E. Sands
Primary Institution: Harvard Medical School
Hypothesis
Automated data can improve surveillance for surgical site infections while reducing resource requirements.
Conclusion
Automated methods for surveillance can enhance the detection of surgical site infections and improve the efficiency of monitoring.
Supporting Evidence
- Automated data can identify over 99% of postdischarge infections.
- Antibiotic exposure is a sensitive indicator of infection.
- Using automated data improved sensitivity for detecting infections compared to traditional methods.
Takeaway
This study shows that using computers to track infections after surgery can help doctors find problems faster and save time.
Methodology
The study utilized automated data from pharmacy and administrative claims to improve infection surveillance.
Potential Biases
There is a risk of bias due to the subjective nature of some diagnostic criteria.
Limitations
Current surveillance systems may lack precision and are subject to interobserver variability.
Participant Demographics
The study involved a mixed group of surgical procedures across various hospitals.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website