The acceptability of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in infants (IPTi) delivered through the expanded programme of immunization in southern Tanzania
2008

Acceptability of Malaria Treatment for Infants in Tanzania

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Robert Pool, Adiel Mushi, Joanna Armstrong Schellenberg, Mrisho Mwifadhi, Pedro Alonso, Catherine Montgomery, Marcel Tanner, Hassan Mshinda, David Schellenberg

Primary Institution: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Hypothesis

Is intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in infants (IPTi) acceptable when delivered through the expanded programme of immunization?

Conclusion

IPTi is generally acceptable in southern Tanzania, but local priorities and social factors significantly influence adherence.

Supporting Evidence

  • IPTi was generally acceptable and resonated with traditional health practices.
  • Mothers valued weighing their children and socializing during clinic visits.
  • Non-adherence was often due to practical and social factors.
  • Information about IPTi spread slowly through the community.

Takeaway

Moms in Tanzania think giving malaria medicine to babies is a good idea, but they want to make sure it fits with their usual health practices.

Methodology

Data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation.

Potential Biases

Potential biases in self-reported data and social desirability may affect the findings.

Limitations

The study may not fully capture the complexities of community perceptions and behaviors regarding IPTi.

Participant Demographics

Participants included mothers of infants, health workers, and community members from various ethnic backgrounds.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1475-2875-7-213

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication