Disability Pension Systems in Norway and Russia for Psychiatric Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Rezvyy Grigory, Schönfelder Walter, Øiesvold Terje, Olstad Reidun, Midré Georges
Primary Institution: Nordland Hospital, Institute of Sociology, University of Tromsø, University Hospital of Northern Norway
Hypothesis
This study aims to describe differences and similarities in the disability pension (DP) system between Norway and Russia, using severe mental disorders as an example.
Conclusion
There are significant differences in the DP application process and criteria between Norway and Russia, which may affect the number of patients receiving DP.
Supporting Evidence
- In Norway, the DP application process is initiated much later than in Russia.
- The medical criterion is the most decisive in Russia, while treatment and rehabilitation criteria are more central in Norway.
- The size of the DP in Norway is sufficient to cover subsistence expenditures, unlike in Russia.
Takeaway
This study looks at how different countries help people with mental health issues get financial support, showing that Norway has a better system than Russia.
Methodology
The study used qualitative interviews and text analysis of laws and guidelines related to disability pensions in both countries.
Potential Biases
The reliance on qualitative interviews may introduce bias based on the perspectives of the participants.
Limitations
The study is primarily hypothesis-generating and does not cover extensive details of the legislative base or practical use of the systems.
Participant Demographics
Participants included mental health professionals from both Norway and Russia, with varying roles in the disability pension process.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website