Health Security: Why 'Public Health' Isn't Enough
Author Information
Author(s): Akhavein Delaram, Sheel Meru, Abimbola Seye
Primary Institution: The University of Sydney
Hypothesis
Why is the term 'health security' used when perhaps simply saying 'public health' would do?
Conclusion
The essay argues that framing health as a security issue can lead to negative outcomes for marginalized individuals and groups.
Supporting Evidence
- The essay highlights the historical roots of health securitization and its implications for global health.
- It discusses how the language of health security can marginalize already vulnerable populations.
- The framing of health issues as security threats can lead to urgent measures that may not consider the well-being of affected individuals.
Takeaway
This study looks at why we talk about health as a security issue instead of just public health, and how that can hurt people who are already struggling.
Methodology
The essay reflects on the political implications of health securitization and its impact on marginalized groups.
Potential Biases
The framing of health issues as security threats may prioritize the interests of powerful nations over those of marginalized populations.
Limitations
The essay does not provide empirical data or specific case studies to support its claims.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website