Understanding Physician Migration from Africa
Author Information
Author(s): Arah Onyebuchi A
Primary Institution: Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
Hypothesis
The choice of migration metrics significantly influences the perceived magnitude and correlates of physician migration from Africa.
Conclusion
The choice of metrics used to assess physician migration from Africa can lead to different conclusions about which countries are most affected.
Supporting Evidence
- Different metrics of physician migration yield different rankings of African countries.
- Higher physician migration density is associated with better health workforce capacity and health spending.
- The emigration fraction does not account for population size, which can misrepresent the impact of migration.
Takeaway
This study looks at how different ways of measuring doctor migration from Africa can show different results about which countries are losing the most doctors.
Methodology
The study used ranking and correlational analyses on migration data from 53 African countries to nine wealthier destination countries.
Potential Biases
Differential bias could occur if the quality of health workforce and migration data is systematically associated with the observed levels of countries' profiles.
Limitations
The study is limited by its focus on African countries and the use of metrics that quantify stock rather than actual flow over time.
Participant Demographics
The study focused on African-born physicians currently employed as medical doctors.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p < 0.001
Statistical Significance
p ≤ 0.011
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website