Validity of Resting Energy Expenditure Predictive Equations before and after an Energy-Restricted Diet Intervention in Obese Women
2011

Validity of Resting Energy Expenditure Predictive Equations in Obese Women

Sample size: 78 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jonatan R. Ruiz, Francisco B. Ortega, Gerardo Rodríguez, Pilar Alkorta, Idoia Labayen

Primary Institution: University of Granada, Spain

Hypothesis

The study investigates the validity of resting energy expenditure (REE) predictive equations before and after a 12-week energy-restricted diet intervention in obese women.

Conclusion

The accuracy of REE predictive equations varies significantly before and after weight loss in non-morbid obese women.

Supporting Evidence

  • The Mifflin equation was the most accurate for predicting REE before the diet intervention.
  • The Owen equation provided the best predictions after the 12-week diet intervention.
  • Accuracy of REE predictions decreased significantly after weight loss.
  • Participants lost an average of close to 10% of their body weight during the study.
  • Variability in REE prediction accuracy was noted across different equations.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well different equations predict how much energy obese women burn at rest, both before and after they lost weight on a diet.

Methodology

The study measured resting energy expenditure using indirect calorimetry and assessed body composition in 86 obese women before and after a 12-week diet intervention.

Potential Biases

The study acknowledges potential biases due to the lack of control over menstrual cycle phases and smoking status.

Limitations

The study did not measure sex hormone levels to ensure participants were in the same menstrual cycle phase, and smoking was not excluded as a criterion.

Participant Demographics

Participants were obese, pre-menopausal Caucasian women aged 19 to 49 years with a BMI between 30 and 39.9 kg/m2.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.044

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0023759

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication