CD8+ T-cell responses to Theileria parva are preferentially directed to a single dominant antigen: Implications for parasite strain-specific immunity
2009

CD8+ T-cell Responses to Theileria parva and Antigen Specificity

Sample size: 8 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Niall D. MacHugh, Timothy Connelley, Simon P. Graham, Roger Pelle, Principia Formisano, Evans L. Taracha, Shirley A. Ellis, Declan J. McKeever, Alison Burrells, W. Ivan Morrison

Primary Institution: The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh

Hypothesis

The study investigates the immunodominance of CD8+ T-cell responses to Theileria parva and its implications for parasite strain-specific immunity.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that CD8+ T-cell responses to Theileria parva are highly focused on a single dominant antigen, which varies with the MHC genotype of the host.

Supporting Evidence

  • Over 60% of responding T cells recognized defined epitopes in the Tp1 and Tp2 antigens.
  • The study confirmed that CD8+ T-cell lines were representative of in vivo memory CD8+ T-cell populations.
  • Immunodominance was shown to influence the parasite strain specificity of the CD8+ T-cell response.

Takeaway

The immune system of cattle can recognize specific parts of a parasite, and this recognition is very focused, meaning it pays more attention to certain parts than others.

Methodology

The study involved immunizing cattle with Theileria parva and analyzing CD8+ T-cell responses to various antigens using cytotoxicity assays and TCR-β chain analysis.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in the selection of cattle based on MHC haplotypes may affect the generalizability of the findings.

Limitations

The study is limited by the number of MHC haplotypes tested and the focus on specific antigens.

Participant Demographics

Holstein–Friesian cattle aged 18–36 months with different MHC haplotypes.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1002/eji.200939227

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication