Validation of the Cognitive Assessment of Later Life Status (CALLS) instrument: a computerized telephonic measure
2007

Validation of the CALLS Instrument for Cognitive Assessment in Older Adults

Sample size: 211 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Valerie C. Crooks, Thomas D. Parsons, J. Galen Buckwalter

Primary Institution: Kaiser Permanente Southern California

Hypothesis

The study aimed to develop a psychometrically valid telephone-administered test of cognitive function in aging.

Conclusion

The CALLS test is a valid measure that provides a unique opportunity to reliably and efficiently study cognitive function in large populations.

Supporting Evidence

  • The CALLS total score was significantly correlated with four neuropsychological assessment components.
  • Older age and lower education were correlated with lower CALLS scores.
  • Women scored better overall than men on the CALLS test.
  • The CALLS showed a high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81.
  • The CALLS total score correlated moderately with the MMSE total score (r = 0.60).
  • Principal component analysis revealed five components of cognitive function.
  • The CALLS test is more efficient than traditional in-person neuropsychological evaluations.

Takeaway

The CALLS test is a quick and reliable way to check how well older people think and remember, using just a phone.

Methodology

The study involved a sequential hierarchical strategy for test development, including a 30-minute telephone assessment and a 2.5-hour in-person neuropsychological assessment.

Potential Biases

The sample may not be representative of individuals with lower education levels, which could affect the results.

Limitations

The CALLS battery lacks visuospatial tasks and may not be suitable for non-English speakers or those with severe visual deficits.

Participant Demographics

Participants were aged 65 and older, with an even distribution of men and women, and included diverse ethnic backgrounds.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2377-7-10

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication