One year of liraglutide treatment offers sustained and more effective glycaemic control and weight reduction compared with sitagliptin, both in combination with metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial
2011

Liraglutide vs. Sitagliptin for Type 2 Diabetes

Sample size: 665 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Richard Pratley, Michael Nauck, Timothy Bailey, Eduard Montanya, Richard Cuddihy, Silvio Filetti, A. Garber, Anne B. Thomsen, H. Hartvig, M. Davies

Primary Institution: University of Vermont College of Medicine

Hypothesis

The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of liraglutide and sitagliptin, both added to metformin, over 52 weeks in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Conclusion

Liraglutide provides greater sustained glycaemic control and body weight reduction over 52 weeks compared to sitagliptin.

Supporting Evidence

  • Liraglutide reduced HbA1c by −1.29% and −1.51% compared to −0.88% with sitagliptin.
  • Weight loss was greater with liraglutide (−2.78 kg and −3.68 kg) than with sitagliptin (−1.16 kg).
  • Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores increased significantly more with liraglutide 1.8 mg than with sitagliptin.

Takeaway

This study shows that taking liraglutide helps people with type 2 diabetes control their blood sugar and lose weight better than sitagliptin.

Methodology

Participants were randomized to receive either liraglutide (1.2 mg or 1.8 mg) or sitagliptin (100 mg) while continuing metformin for 52 weeks.

Potential Biases

Potential conflicts of interest due to funding and author disclosures.

Limitations

The study lacked a placebo group and was not double-blinded.

Participant Demographics

Participants were adults with type 2 diabetes previously treated with metformin.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI: −0.59 to −0.22 for 1.2 mg and −0.81 to −0.44 for 1.8 mg

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02656.x

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication