Quality of Cancer Registry Data
Author Information
Author(s): L.J. Schouten, J.J. Jager, P.A. van den Brandt
Primary Institution: Comprehensive Cancer Centre Limburg
Hypothesis
The study aims to compare data supplied by clinicians with data collected by registration personnel to assess the quality of cancer registry data.
Conclusion
The study found that registration personnel are able to collect cancer registry data with a high degree of accuracy.
Supporting Evidence
- 190 cases were analyzed for agreement between clinician and registry data.
- Disagreements were found primarily in the primary site coding.
- 85% of cases had no major disagreements or only minor disagreements.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well doctors and data collectors agree on cancer patient information, and it found that the data collectors did a really good job.
Methodology
Twenty clinicians reabstracted information from a random sample of about ten patients each, diagnosed with cancer in 1989 or 1990, and compared it with cancer registry records.
Potential Biases
Differences in coding rules and clinician precision may introduce bias.
Limitations
The study may not account for all possible discrepancies in data collection methods between clinicians and registration personnel.
Participant Demographics
Twenty clinicians from various specialties participated in the study.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website