Survival Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Author Information
Author(s): Carlo Signorelli, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Annunziato Anghelone, Alessandro Passardi, Giovanni Luca Frassineti, Alessandro Bittoni, Jessica Lucchetti, Lorenzo Angotti, Emanuela Di Giacomo, Ina Valeria Zurlo, Cristina Morelli, Emanuela Dell’Aquila, Adele Artemi, Donatello Gemma, Domenico Cristiano Corsi, Alessandra Emiliani, Marta Ribelli, Federica Mazzuca, Giulia Arrivi, Federica Zoratto, Mario Giovanni Chilelli, Marta Schirripa, Maria Grazia Morandi, Fiorenza Santamaria, Manuela Dettori, Antonella Cosimati, Rosa Saltarelli, Alessandro Minelli, Emanuela Lucci-Cordisco, Michele Basso
Hypothesis
Does rechallenge therapy improve survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil?
Conclusion
Rechallenge therapy may improve survival rates in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, especially when administered before sequential regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil treatment.
Supporting Evidence
- 981 patients underwent T and/or R therapy, while 175 patients had therapy rechallenge before T and/or R.
- The median overall survival for patients treated with T/R and R/T sequences in the rechallenge therapy cohort was 14.5 months and 17.6 months, respectively.
- A statistically significant survival benefit was observed in patients who received monotherapy with R compared to the T group.
- In the no-rechallenge cohort, the mOS was statistically longer in the R/T sequence than in the T/R sequence.
- The study suggests that rechallenge therapy may improve survival rates in the third-line treatment of mCRC.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well certain cancer treatments work for patients whose previous treatments didn't work. It found that giving some treatments again can help patients live longer.
Methodology
The study analyzed medical records of 1156 patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer from 17 Italian centers between 2012 and 2023, comparing survival outcomes based on treatment sequences.
Potential Biases
Potential selection bias due to non-randomized treatment assignment.
Limitations
The study's retrospective design may introduce bias, and the sample sizes for some subgroups were small.
Participant Demographics
The majority of patients were male, with a median age of 71 years in the no-rechallenge group.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.0014
Confidence Interval
95% CI = 10.1–89.8
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website