Comparing Two Online Smoking Cessation Programs
Author Information
Author(s): Jean-François Etter, Norman Cameron
Primary Institution: Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Geneva
Hypothesis
To compare the efficacy of two Internet-based, computer-tailored smoking cessation programs.
Conclusion
The original program produced higher smoking abstinence rates than the modified program in smokers in the contemplation stage of change and in former smokers.
Supporting Evidence
- The original program had a 10.9% abstinence rate compared to 8.9% for the modified program in current smokers.
- In former smokers, the abstinence rates were 25.2% for the original program and 15.7% for the modified program.
- Statistically significant differences were found in quit rates favoring the original program among smokers in the contemplation stage.
Takeaway
This study looked at two online programs to help people stop smoking. One program worked better than the other for certain groups of smokers.
Methodology
Randomized controlled trial comparing two online smoking cessation programs with tailored counseling letters and email reminders.
Potential Biases
More non-respondents in the modified program could artificially favor the original program in analyses.
Limitations
The study did not include a no-treatment control group, and the follow-up response rate was low.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 74% current smokers and 26% former smokers, with a mean age of around 34 years.
Statistical Information
P-Value
P<.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI 1.08-1.43
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website