Assessing preconception health in Australia to support better outcomes in the first 2000 days – A critical need for building a core indicator framework
2024

Assessing Preconception Health in Australia

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Asvini K. Subasinghe, Kirsten I. Black, Edwina Dorney, Jacqueline A. Boyle

Primary Institution: Monash University

Hypothesis

How can preconception health indicators be effectively monitored in Australia?

Conclusion

The study found significant gaps in the availability of preconception health indicator data across Australian perinatal databases.

Supporting Evidence

  • Preconception health indicators are critical for optimal maternal and child outcomes.
  • Data on social determinants of health indicators were missing across all health domains.
  • Better data linkage is needed for ongoing monitoring of women's preconception health.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well Australia tracks important health information before pregnancy, and found that a lot of important data is missing.

Methodology

An audit of perinatal databases across Australian states and territories was conducted to assess the availability of preconception health core indicators.

Limitations

Data were incomplete for several key indicators, and there was variability in how data were collected across states.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1111/ajo.13815

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication