Comparing patient characteristics and treatment processes in patients receiving physical therapy in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands: Cross sectional analyses of data from three clinical databases
2008

Comparing Physical Therapy Practices in the US, Israel, and the Netherlands

Sample size: 63000 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Swinkels Ilse CS, Hart Dennis L, Deutscher Daniel, van den Bosch Wil JH, Dekker Joost, de Bakker Dinny H, van den Ende Cornelia HM

Primary Institution: NIVEL; Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research

Hypothesis

Can patient demographics and treatment processes in outpatient physical therapy be compared across the United States, Israel, and the Netherlands?

Conclusion

The study found significant differences in treatment processes and the number of visits among countries, indicating caution in generalizing physical therapy outcomes internationally.

Supporting Evidence

  • Data from approximately 63,000 patients from the US, 100,000 from Israel, and 12,000 from the Netherlands were analyzed.
  • Patients in the US and Israel had more chronic complaints compared to those in the Netherlands.
  • Physical agents and mechanical modalities were used more frequently in the US and Israel than in the Netherlands.
  • The mean number of visits per treatment episode varied from 8 in Israel to 11 in the US and the Netherlands.

Takeaway

This study looked at how physical therapy is done in three different countries and found that they do things differently, which means we can't just assume what works in one place will work in another.

Methodology

Cross-sectional data from three clinical databases were analyzed for patients aged 18 and older who started outpatient therapy in 2005.

Potential Biases

Differences in data collection and operational definitions among the databases may introduce bias.

Limitations

The study's generalizability is limited due to the focus on only three countries and differences in data collection methods across databases.

Participant Demographics

Patients aged 18 and older, with a mix of genders and health conditions treated across the three countries.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-8-163

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication