The impact of the perception of treatment choice on satisfaction with treatment, experienced chemotherapy burden and current quality of life
2004

Impact of Treatment Choice on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer

Sample size: 448 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jansen S J T, Otten W, van de Velde C J H, Nortier J W R, Stiggelbout A M

Primary Institution: Leiden University Medical Center

Hypothesis

Does the perception of treatment choice affect satisfaction with treatment and quality of life in early-stage breast cancer patients?

Conclusion

Patients' perceptions of having no choice regarding adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly impact their satisfaction with treatment or quality of life.

Supporting Evidence

  • 78% of patients reported a lack of choice regarding treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Patients who perceived a treatment choice had higher satisfaction scores.
  • Older patients reported higher satisfaction with their assigned treatment.
  • Perception of treatment choice did not significantly affect experienced chemotherapy burden.

Takeaway

This study looked at breast cancer patients and found that feeling like they had no choice in treatment didn't make them less happy with their care or their life.

Methodology

Patients with early-stage breast cancer were surveyed about their perception of treatment choice, satisfaction with treatment, chemotherapy burden, and quality of life.

Potential Biases

Patients' subjective experiences may not accurately reflect whether they were given a choice, potentially skewing results.

Limitations

The study may not be generalizable due to differences between responders and nonresponders, and it does not confirm whether patients were actually offered a choice of treatment.

Participant Demographics

The majority of participants were female, with a mean age of 60 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6601903

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication