Evaluating Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Guidelines in Brazilian Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Author Information
Author(s): Oliveira Antunes Murillo MD, PhD, Fernandes Fabio MD, PhD, Arteaga-Fernandez Edmundo MD, PhD, Alvarez Ramires Félix José MD, PhD, Machado Correia Vinicius MD, Novaes Cardoso Juliano MD, Romero Cristhian Espinoza MD, Sousa Henrique Martins MD, Soliani Marília Taily MD, Dal Piaz Matheus Ramos Ramos MD, Rodrigues Gandarella Anna Danielle MD, Rocha Teixeira Ruiza Gonçalves MD, Mady Charles MD, PhD, Assis Moura Tavares Caio MD, PhD, Guimarães Patricia O. MD, PhD, Madrini Junior Vagner Dr. MD
Primary Institution: Instituto do Coração, Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Hypothesis
The study aims to evaluate the performance of the 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines for sudden cardiac death risk stratification in a Brazilian cohort with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Conclusion
The 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines have limitations in predicting sudden cardiac death events in Brazilian patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Supporting Evidence
- The 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines classified 56% of patients as high-risk for sudden cardiac death.
- The 2014 ESC guidelines identified 29% of patients as high-risk.
- The primary outcome occurred in 12% of the high-risk group identified by the ACC/AHA guidelines.
- The primary outcome occurred in 13% of the high-risk group identified by the ESC guidelines.
- Both guidelines showed low discriminatory power for sudden cardiac death risk in this cohort.
Takeaway
Doctors used two sets of rules to see who might have a heart problem, but they didn't work well for Brazilian patients with a specific heart condition.
Methodology
This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who were followed in a dedicated clinic at a tertiary hospital in Brazil.
Potential Biases
The study may have bias due to its retrospective nature and the exclusion of certain patient groups.
Limitations
The study is limited by its single-center design, small sample size, low event rate, and missing echocardiographic data for some patients.
Participant Demographics
The mean age of participants was 41.5 years, with 56% being male.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.05
Confidence Interval
95% CI 0.50–0.76
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website