Assessment of Outcomes by Intention-to-Treat Comparison for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Derived Cohort Study
2025

Outcomes of Neoadjuvant vs. Palliative Treatment in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Sample size: 134 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Larsson Patrik, Swartling Oskar, Cheraghi Diana, Khawaja Ajnon, Soreide Kjetil, Sparrelid Ernesto, Ghorbani Poya

Primary Institution: Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Hypothesis

Patients recommended neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer have a longer overall survival compared to patients recommended palliative chemotherapy.

Conclusion

In patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, survival was not statistically different between those recommended for neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with those recommended palliative chemotherapy.

Supporting Evidence

  • 8803 MDT events were held during the study period.
  • 162 patients had locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
  • Median overall survival for neoadjuvant therapy was 11.8 months.
  • Median overall survival for palliative chemotherapy was 11.0 months.
  • Only 11% of patients with pancreatic cancer had locally advanced disease.

Takeaway

This study looked at patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and found that those who got chemotherapy before surgery didn't live longer than those who just got comfort care.

Methodology

An observational cohort study analyzing overall survival using Kaplan–Meier estimates and multivariable analyses.

Potential Biases

There is a risk of publication bias and selection bias due to the nature of the study design.

Limitations

The study may have selection bias and a small sample size, which could affect the statistical power.

Participant Demographics

Patients were aged ≥ 18 years, with a mix of treatment recommendations including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and palliative care.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.226

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.02–3.29

Statistical Significance

p = 0.226

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1245/s10434-024-16291-9

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication