Understanding Delays in Cancer Diagnosis
Author Information
Author(s): Neal Richard D, Pasterfield Diana, Wilkinson Clare, Hood Kerenza, Makin Matthew, Lawrence Helen
Primary Institution: Cardiff University
Hypothesis
Can a new questionnaire effectively measure patient and primary care delays in cancer diagnosis?
Conclusion
A more personal approach to data collection about symptom duration is needed rather than relying solely on postal questionnaires.
Supporting Evidence
- The response rate was only 46.2%, indicating a need for improved engagement strategies.
- Anxiety was noted as a reason for the low response rate.
- The study successfully linked outcome data on cancer diagnosis with patient responses.
Takeaway
This study tried to find out how long it takes for people to see a doctor after noticing cancer symptoms, but many people didn't respond to the survey.
Methodology
A postal questionnaire was developed and sent to 184 patients with suspected cancer to measure their response times to symptoms.
Potential Biases
Potential recall bias due to the retrospective nature of the questionnaire.
Limitations
The response rate was low, and the questionnaire design may have caused anxiety, affecting participation.
Participant Demographics
Participants included adult patients with suspected cancer, with a higher response rate among women and younger individuals.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website