Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators
2008

Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators

Sample size: 12 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): T Liesenjohann, J A Eccard

Primary Institution: University of Bielefeld

Hypothesis

How do voles adjust their foraging strategies in response to different types of uniform predation risk?

Conclusion

Voles adapt their feeding strategies to perceived levels of uniform risk, concentrating their foraging effort on fewer trays under increased risk.

Supporting Evidence

  • Voles reduced food intake by half when exposed to both avian and mustelid predation risks.
  • The presence of weasel odour significantly affected short-term foraging behavior.
  • Voles concentrated their foraging effort on fewer trays under increased uniform risk.

Takeaway

Voles change where and how they look for food based on how much danger they feel from predators, focusing on fewer spots when they feel more threatened.

Methodology

The study used a 2 × 2 factorial design to simulate avian and mammalian predation risks and measured voles' foraging behavior in controlled arenas.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the artificial setting and the limited number of tested individuals.

Limitations

The study was conducted in artificial environments, which may not fully replicate natural conditions.

Participant Demographics

Twelve wild caught male bank voles (Myodes glareolus) were used in the study.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.03

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6785-8-19

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication