Actigraph Accelerometer-Defined Boundaries for Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity Intensities in 7 Year Old Children
2011

Accelerometer Cut Points for Children's Activity Levels

Sample size: 53 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Pulsford Richard M., Cortina-Borja Mario, Rich Carly, Kinnafick Florence-Emilie, Dezateux Carol, Griffiths Lucy J.

Primary Institution: Medical Research Council Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, University College London Institute of Child Health

Hypothesis

To calibrate the Actigraph GT1M accelerometer to define thresholds for sedentary behaviour and physical activity categories in young children.

Conclusion

The accelerometer cut points established in this study can effectively classify sedentary behaviour and distinguish between light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity in seven-year-old children.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study established cut points for sedentary behaviour (<100 counts/min) and for light (≤2240), moderate (≤3840), and vigorous (≥3841) physical activity.
  • The area under the ROC curve for sedentary behaviour and vigorous activity was 0.98, indicating excellent discrimination.
  • Sensitivity and specificity were highest for sedentary (99% and 97%) and vigorous (95% and 91%) activities.

Takeaway

This study found specific numbers that help us understand how much kids move or sit still, which can help keep them healthy.

Methodology

Accelerometer-based assessments were calibrated against energy expenditure measures in 53 seven-year-old children performing various activities.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the self-paced nature of activities and the inability to measure basal metabolic rates under controlled conditions.

Limitations

The study could not control for the time of day each child was tested, which may have influenced metabolic rates.

Participant Demographics

Children aged 7 to 8 years, with a sample of 53 participants (29 male).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0021822

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication