A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the ‘Fast ForWord’ language intervention program
2011

Effectiveness of the Fast ForWord Language Intervention Program

Sample size: 6 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Gemma K Strong, Carole J Torgerson, David Torgerson, Charles Hulme

Primary Institution: University of York

Hypothesis

Can the Fast ForWord language intervention program effectively improve children's reading and oral language skills?

Conclusion

The analysis shows that Fast ForWord is not effective in treating children's reading or language difficulties.

Supporting Evidence

  • Meta-analyses indicated no significant effect of Fast ForWord on reading or language outcomes.
  • Previous studies have shown mixed results, but overall evidence does not support Fast ForWord's effectiveness.
  • Many claims about Fast ForWord's benefits are based on non-peer-reviewed studies.

Takeaway

Fast ForWord is a computer program meant to help kids with language problems, but it doesn't actually work.

Methodology

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing Fast ForWord intervention groups to control groups.

Potential Biases

Potential publication bias due to only including peer-reviewed studies.

Limitations

The studies included varied in quality, and some had high attrition rates.

Participant Demographics

Children aged 6 to 12 years with language impairments.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI −.09 to .25

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02329.x

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication