Stakeholder perspectives on the current status and potential barriers of patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) across Europe
2024

Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Europe

Sample size: 168 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Anke-Peggy Holtorf, Neil Bertelsen, Hannes Jarke, Maria Dutarte, Silvia Scalabrini, Valentina Strammiello

Primary Institution: Health Outcomes Strategies GmbH

Hypothesis

What are the current barriers and potential good practices for patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) across Europe?

Conclusion

The study highlights the need for improved guidance, communication, and systematic processes for patient involvement in HTA.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients have insights and information no other stakeholder has.
  • Barriers to patient involvement include lack of knowledge and resources.
  • Improved transparency and communication are needed for better patient involvement.
  • Government mandates could strengthen patient involvement in HTA.
  • Patient organizations can help bridge the gap between HTA bodies and patients.

Takeaway

This study shows that patients should be involved in decisions about their health, but many don't know how to participate or feel they lack the necessary information.

Methodology

An online survey was conducted among HTA stakeholders across Europe to gather perspectives on patient involvement.

Potential Biases

The responses may not fully represent all stakeholder perspectives due to the limited number of participants with direct experience in HTA.

Limitations

The survey had a limited core group of stakeholders involved in its development and a relatively small number of respondents with experience in patient involvement.

Participant Demographics

Responses came from HTA practitioners, patient stakeholders, industry representatives, providers, and academics across thirty-two European countries.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Confidence Interval

95 percent CI [0.437, 0.456]

Statistical Significance

p=0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1017/S0266462324004707

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication