Single-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study of Cefmetazole and Cefoxitin in the Treatment of Postcesarean Endometritis
1995

Cefmetazole vs. Cefoxitin for Postcesarean Endometritis

Sample size: 355 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Ashwin Chatwani, Mark Martens, David A. Grimes, Molly Chatterjee, Melvin Noah, Marion M. Stamp-Cole, Kimberly T. Perry, the Cefmetazole Study Group

Primary Institution: Temple University School of Medicine

Hypothesis

Cefmetazole is more effective than cefoxitin in treating endometritis after cesarean delivery.

Conclusion

Cefmetazole was significantly more effective than cefoxitin in treating endometritis following cesarean delivery.

Supporting Evidence

  • The cure rate for cefmetazole was 89% compared to 79% for cefoxitin.
  • Adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.
  • Patients were followed for clinical responses and side effects.

Takeaway

This study found that cefmetazole works better than cefoxitin for treating infections after cesarean sections.

Methodology

A single-blind, multicenter, prospective, randomized study comparing cefmetazole and cefoxitin in 355 patients with endometritis after cesarean delivery.

Limitations

The study was limited to patients with endometritis after cesarean delivery and excluded those with other infections.

Participant Demographics

{"mean_age":24.3,"weight":78.3,"height":159.6,"race_distribution":{"white":16.8,"black":41.0,"oriental":0.9,"hispanic":40.0,"others":1.3}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.006

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication