Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Advanced Technology Clinical Simulation Manikins in Improving the Capability of Australian Paramedics to Deliver High-Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Pre- and Postintervention Study
2024

Improving Paramedics' CPR Skills with Simulation Manikins

Sample size: 106 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Alison Zucca, Jamie Bryant, Jeffrey Purse, Stuart Szwec, Robert Sanson-Fisher, Lucy Leigh, Mike Richer, Alan Morrison

Primary Institution: School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle

Hypothesis

ECC performance would improve after training and be maintained over time among paramedics with access to the simulation training resources at their location.

Conclusion

Training and deployment of simulator manikins did not significantly change paramedics’ overall ECC performance.

Supporting Evidence

  • Paramedics had high resuscitation skills before the SCOPE intervention.
  • ECC compression scores were on average 95% or above at all time points.
  • Paramedics had significantly lower odds of achieving compressions with adequate rate at time 3 compared to time 2.

Takeaway

This study looked at how using special training manikins helps paramedics do CPR better. Even though they trained, their skills didn't really get better over time.

Methodology

A pre- and postintervention study design without a control group was used, collecting data at three time points.

Potential Biases

Participants may have been a more capable subgroup of paramedics, as champions self-nominated or were selected for their interest in education.

Limitations

The study design without a control group may obscure the effect of the intervention, and high baseline performance may have limited the ability to detect improvements.

Participant Demographics

Most participants were male (62.3%) with a mean age of 40.48 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P=.01

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.12-0.78

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.2196/49895

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication